Thought Leadership:
CTRM vs Car Lease
Why leasing a CTRM is not the same as leasing a car?

Why leasing a CTRM is not the same as leasing a car?
It’s sometimes argued in the commodity trading industry that, since people often lease a car for five years, organisations should likewise commit to a five-year CTRM lease. At Amphora, that has always felt like a flawed comparison as a CTRM isn’t a car, so why try to treat it like one? Yes, a lease can help manage costs over a time period, but you can end up paying more in the longer term. A lease makes sense in many instances but why for five-years? And why the car lease analogy to justify it?
In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the analogy, ask whether it still makes sense in 2025, and examine the real reasons why five-year car leases exist, and whether those same factors apply to CTRM licensing.



In reality, licensing CTRM software is fundamentally different to leasing a car. Being tied to a five-year contract without a clear reason can be frustrating if you want the flexibility to change vendors. In contrast, rolling one-year contracts provide greater control and helps to mitigate the risks of selecting a CTRM vendor and solution.
In the past, on-premises CTRM implementations were costly and could take years to go live. By 2025, however, vendors offer cloud-based solutions that can be deployed in just weeks. This accelerated timeline makes the case for locking into a five-year commitment even harder to justify.

Conclusion
In the end, it comes down to the fact that you simply cannot compare a car with a CTRM software solution for any number of reasons and locking into such a long lease, rather than bringing benefit, brings many issues.
If you are in the market to purchase a CTRM or if the contract with your current vendor is up for renewal, why get tied into 5 years, when significantly more flexible one year rolling contracts are available?
After all, you are not leasing a car!
